Language

 

from the wiki

from the wiki

Further to my musings the other day, I’ve been thinking about my own use of language. Having looked into Wittgenstein a little recently, I realise that this can run quite deep, but it’s interesting regardless: W.’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophica ends with a sweeping statement: “Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.”

 

It’s an interesting comparison to my thoughts on Bukowski – not a word wasted there, and I’m sure Wittgenstein would have approved. Ludwig’s point of view was (if we are to take that statement as summarising his thoughts, which wouldn’t be really correct, but it’s a useful indicator) basically, if you don’t know what you’re talking about, shut up. Bukowski would probably have agreed, evenutally: all I’ve read so far – admittedly not a lot – is so elemental with a rare knack of expressing what most people simply wouldn’t or couldn’t. Wittgenstein was famous for shouting down those who spoke unnecessarily, and Bukowski’s efforts in minimalisation seem to represent that very well. 

Ham on Rye shows, in glimpses, that Bukowski was an exceptionally intelligent and literate man, yet his story is riddled with the horrific flaws of humanity, and I guess it’s this inherent contradiction that both men recognised. Wittgenstein’s solution was to analyse the problem and get to the root of the misconceptions concerning most people’s use of language, the weaknesses and the problems within. Bukowski’s approach was different, instead filtering out the irrelevant to create in his own art a more direct approach, free from chaff.

It’s an example I could learn a lot from, I think. The problem with blogging is that there’s no impetus to hone anything down: there’s no word limits, and the ‘Publish’ button is well within my periphery vision while I’m typing. Just one click and I’m done – it hardly seems worth analysing or honing the text. I really should scrutinise my output a bit more, try and make it “sound speech that cannot be condemned, so that one who is an opponent may be ashamed, having nothing evil to say of me.”

I can do that!

Maybe?

Advertisements

One Response

  1. […] everyone that commented, so I am currently awaiting discussion on the confluence between Wagner and Bukowski through the medium of Tom Waits (him […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: